The Blogg

June 29, 2010

Game Review: Mass Effect

Filed under: Gaming — chadhogg @ 12:33 pm

I had high expectations, and this could have been a great game. Although it received almost universally high ratings, I found it flawed in many regards. Is this “a new high mark for storytelling in games”, and are the RPG elements “outstanding”? Maybe to a typical XBox360 owner, but I would disagree. Of course, that’s not to say that I am not looking forward to playing the sequel. Based on what I had been told and the fact that they came from the same company, I was expecting Mass Effect to be Knights Of The Old Republic in a new universe. Rather, it is an FPS with RPG elements, and thus my natural comparison is against Deus Ex. Unfortunately for Mass Effect, neither it nor anything else has quite measured up.

First, let us discuss the story. It is difficult to write original space opera content when the ur-examples loom so large. A hive race of sentient machines that seem to exist for no purpose but to destroy organic lifeforms? It’s the Borg Geth of course. Small, elite order of warriors, respected by some but distrusted by others, who protect the galaxy? You must be talking about the Jedi Spectres. In spite of that, much of the setting and plot of the game is indeed new and interesting. The writers make some bold choices, and there are definitely emotionally moving moments. They try to stretch the setting such that it makes sense for the hero to be out on his own, answering to no one, and it sort of works; better than most games that just hand-wave this away.

The actual plot quests (“Missions”) are varied and interesting, but the main plot is only a small part of the game. The side quests (“Assignments”) are mostly formulaic: land on a planet, enter a small installation, kill everything, press a button at the far end, repeat. There are only a few different building designs, which make it seem even more repetitive. It makes sense that a single well-tested design would be fabricated and repeated throughout the galaxy, but this is a case where realism is boring.

I like the design of the combat system, from the use of overheating as a temporary limiting factor in the use of weapons rather than ammunition shortages, to making every weapon upgradeable. The first feature, combined with shields and health regeneration, mean that you never need to worry about optimally completing a battle and makes the entire experience very fluid. My first playthrough was as the default Soldier and I mostly found my companions’ uses of tech and biotic skills to be an annoyance. I plan to go through again in hardcore difficulty with a tech- or biotic-based character, and my expectation is that the battles will become more tactical and those skills will be useful. The economy is a definite weakness; the items that you find are almost always as good or better than those you can buy. The only purchases I made in the entire game were the prototype weapons available after the Rich achievement, the manufacturers’ licenses, and the upgrades that allow you to carry more grenades and MediGel. There are no unique items in the game, which means that you never get the excitement of finding a new, amazing item as there was in KoToR. I suspect the last two issues are related. The decryption minigame is annoying after you’ve done it a few dozen times, and driving the Mako around also becomes tedious when you yet again must find the spot in the mountain range separating you from your destination that is not so steep as to prevent your passage. Also, this is the second consecutive Bioware game I’ve played in which I had to solve a Tower of Hanoi problem. Surely they can come up with *some* other kind of puzzle.

This is, I believe, the first game I have played that includes Achievements. If their desired effect is to help wring replayability out of things that would otherwise lack it, it is working. I am going to play through a second time partially to see how a different class selection and wildly different personality and approach to solving problems will affect the game, but also partially to unlock more of them. For a completist like myself, such a shiny trinket dangling in my face is hard to pass by.

I saw the alien sideboob, and am glad to report it did not scar me for life. If you wanted to script a situation to show how absurd “think of the children” thinking and uninformed mass hysteria can be, you could not have come up with something better than the story surrounding this. It truly is incredible. (By the way, I noticed that the mother of the owner of the alien sideboob was voiced by Marina Sirtis. For nerdy young men of my generation that’s the original alien topboob, and it was on network television every week.)

June 21, 2010

Wiretapping

Filed under: Politics — chadhogg @ 12:02 pm

This article is a disgusting example of what happens when we allow the criminal code to be so vast that nearly everyone, everywhere, at any time is in violation of something. On one level, this is a case of law enforcement doing whatever they can to cover up evidence of near-malfeasance. That is terrible, but I am more concerned with the law itself that is written in such a way that this could be construed as a crime. I am glad to see that Pennsylvania has a statutory exception allowing the activity of on-duty police officers to be recorded, but we need to go much further. The idea that “wiretapping” laws should be applicable to cases in which no tapping of wires or similar actions occurred is ludicrous.

If a helmet-mounted camera is an instance of wiretapping, what about cameras owned by banks and placed nearby automated teller machines in public streets? Do the banks have some kind of immunity from this because they are large corporations? What about a student who uses a personal recorder to tape lectures for later review? Should they be required to explicitly inform all other students in the class that they are doing so, lest they accidentally record a student asking a question or talking to a classmate? Are pranksters making “candid camera” style recordings criminals?

What would be a sane, fair law that protects privacy? How about this: It is a felony to intentionally record, transmit, or listen to a conversation to which you are not a party when the parties to the conversation have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Any other such activity is perfectly legal. The cases in which a person might reasonably expect privacy are quite limited, restricted essentially to conversations occurring on private property. The case discussed in this article would be legal for two reasons: first, it occurred on a public roadway where there is no expectation of privacy, and second, the motorcyclist was a party to the conversation. The second exception is not sufficient by itself because we would like to protect things like the video of the Rodney King beating, which was produced by a bystander.

Other than the “common sense” change in my law related to public spaces is a potentially more controversial change: that you may record any conversation to which you are a party. Recording conversations is one of the only ways in which the powerless can have justice against the powerful. Whether the subject is a motorist recording a questionable police action, an employee recording instructions from a supervisor who likes to blame his workers for his own errors, a victim recording a threat from a bully or blackmailer, or a whistleblower gathering proof of misconduct, the ability to record is essential. In my opinion this good far outweighs privacy concerns. After all, if I am party to a conversation I may already tell other people what I heard. The only change in allowing that conversation to be recorded is that I will have proof. The truth would set us free-er.

June 16, 2010

Nimble Cities Idea

Filed under: Uncategorized — chadhogg @ 2:10 pm

I submitted the following to Slate’s Hive project on transportation issues based on an idea I have often thought about during long, monotonous drives. I had written much more, but needed to pare it down to 1200 words:

My proposal is for intracity travel. In spite of gas price spikes and global warming fears, the American fascination with personal automobiles persists. Passenger rail is unpopular because it is slow, expensive, and requires renting a vehicle at the destination if one will be required. I propose to build alongside existing limited access roads with few interchanges a rail system designed to carry anything smaller than a full-size van. When motorists arrive at such a highway they could choose to drive it as usual, or to pay a fee to drive their vehicle into a rail car, where it would be secured until they reached their exit. Because all traffic is on rails and automatically controlled, this system could safely operate at speeds far above those allowed on the highway. Much like some existing locomotives, these rail cars could be powered by electricity generated from renewable resources and distributed through a “third rail”. This proposal would allow people to continue using the personal automobiles that they love, while helping to transition away from fossil fuel use, speeding long journeys, preventing crashes, and allowing motorists to focus on other tasks.

June 10, 2010

Flyers Season Recap

Filed under: Sports — chadhogg @ 12:03 pm

Last night’s overtime loss was disappointing, but you cannot be too upset about losing a great series against a great team to end a charmed playoffs. I watched more hockey this year than ever before, and I’ll have these fond memories of the season for a long time:

  • Wondering why on earth successful goaltenders Biron and Niittymaki were allowed to leave and replaced by questionable Ray Emery and career backup Brian Boucher.
  • Coach John Stevens being replaced by Peter Laviolette, under whom the team struggled for weeks before adjusting to his scheme.
  • Playing the NHL Winter Classic at Fenway Park and losing on a goal by former Flyers star Mark Recchi.
  • Watching Richards, Pronger, Timonen, and Tollefsen competing in the Olympics.
  • Dan Carcillo figuring out how to control himself and turning out to be a pretty talented winger, while still having more fun than anyone else on the rink.
  • Emery getting hurt, then his replacement Leighton, then *his* replacement Boucher, then !his! replacement Backlund, then Boucher getting hurt a second time on the day that Leighton returned from injury.
  • Blair Betts and Ian Laperriere’s superb penalty killing.
  • Leighton nearly scoring an own goal, hitting the post while trying to direct the puck behind his net.
  • Nervously watching the standings as the Flyers seemed to skid out of playoff contention through the last month of the season, eventually winning their last game in a shootout for the 7th seed.
  • Losing Carter, Gagne, and Laperriere all in the first round and thinking we had no chance of moving on without them.
  • Unknown rookie Ville Leino playing like a superstar throughout the playoffs.
  • Losing the first 3 games of the series against Boston, improbably evening the series, going down 3-0 in the first period of game 7, and clawing back to win the game and the series 4-3.
  • The 7th seeded Flyers and 8th seeded Canadiens making the Eastern Conference finals.
  • Winning two of four tightly contested games in the Stanley Cup finals before falling apart in game 5 and rallying to tie what had been a poor performance in game 6 before eventually losing.

Powered by WordPress